Letters graphic

Oppose Judicial Nominating Commission Modernization bill

I urge my fellow Iowans to ask their Iowa House Representatives to oppose the so-called “Judicial Nominating Commission Modernization” bill. Rather than improving our judicial nomination process, this bill would make it more partisan and influenced by special interests rather than experts.

Under current law, the nominating commission consists of a state supreme court justice, eight lawyers, and eight non-lawyers. The non-lawyers are selected by the governor while the lawyers are elected by their peers. This process ensures that half the commissioners are experts while the public will is still represented.

The new system would eliminate Iowa’s lawyers from the committee selection process and replace them legislative leadership, while keeping the number of lawyers on the commission the same. This sounds nice in theory, but it is much easier for special interests to influence the picks of a few legislative leaders than all the state’s lawyers.This would lead to the selection of partisans rather than respected attorneys.

Moreover, the bill eliminates Senate oversight of the governor’s picks, leaving her more free to appoint anyone who meets basic requirements rather than having to justify her picks.

Let’s let experts, rather than politicians, decide who picks our judicial nominees.

Dan Voss

Ames

Sign up for The Daily Nonpareil news alerts

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.